Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NYPD ten-codes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYPD ten-codes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY I see no encyclopedic reason for this article CTJF83 chat 05:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I guess it's interesting and useful, but nominator is right that Wikipedia isn't a directory. I would say that some of this could be mentioned in the article Ten-code (which, depending on what day it is, sometimes has a list of such codes and their meaning for different police departments) and that a link would be provided for people who want to know more. This is not information that would be lost if the article is deleted. Mandsford (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikipedia is a source of miscellaneous information , like an almanac, as well as an encyclopedia .A list of these for major cities --especially those cites frequently the settings of fiction--would be appropriate information. A list of this for every possible jurisdiction would not. DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not a directory, or the manual for the NYPD CTJF83 chat 07:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd add that this is nothing more than a copy and paste of this, so it's not as if this was a product of someone's hard work, nor will it be a matter of losing information (in other words, the link can be included in the Ten-code article. I guess the prospect of having lists for cities that are the settings for police shows may be what I find most unsettling. I'd rather that a link to the official NYPD codes site be added to the article about NYPD Blue or CSI:NY or any other place where it might be a welcome addition. Mandsford (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Once again, lists are abused on Wikipedia and someone will almost always !vote to keep them. JBsupreme (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not Google, and this page happens to be ripped off a Google page ([1]). If this is not COPYVIO, it's much too localized compared to the Ten-codes article. Seems to me that Ten-codes is doing the job just fine without a merge from this one. Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep the utility of the NYPD 10-code for fiction consumers makes it worthy of retention; it should be noted that including it in the main Ten-codes page would confuse, and does confuse, due to redefinitions. It's even more useful for authoring fictional content, for both writing and roleplaying contexts. Wfh (talk) 08:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Already mentioned in the main [[[Ten-code]] article and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. I put the web reference as an external link in that article so it's still easily accessible for those who want it. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.