Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NWA Shockwave
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. Consensus was obviously clearer on the related articles, but also one the main one when taking into account the strength of arguments presented. Petros471 14:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- NWA Shockwave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod, "in honor of the great Billy "whatshisname" Firehawk". Non notable independent wrestling promotion, no evidence of multiple independent non trivial reliable sources, fails WP:CORP. One Night In Hackney303 06:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages:[reply]
- NWA Shockwave Heavyweight Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- NWA Shockwave Internet Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- NWA Shockwave Women's Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- NWA Shockwave Tag Team Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- NWA Shockwave Cruiser X Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete all more wrestling fancruft. Non-notable wrestling promotions... even if this had sources (it doesn't) it's not worth keeping. /Blaxthos 16:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain The main article NWA Shockwave seems okay, I personally wouldn't delete it, but I don't think you need all those other articles about the belts. Govvy 13:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep main article, delete the article regarding the belts. Wildthing61476 15:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps you'd like to provde some independent non trivial sources for the main article then? One Night In Hackney303 21:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Main article Delete the articles regarding the belts.--Unopeneddoor 03:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Again, the article has no independent sources, so saying keep without providing sources does not address the reasons it has been nominated. One Night In Hackney303 04:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all of the articles, none of them provide any reliable non-trivial sources. Burntsauce 23:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.