Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIMML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Virginia Bioinformatics Institute. v/r - T P 03:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NIMML

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Suggest a merge with Virginia Bioinformatics Institute. RA (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think a merge is appropriate. Virginia Bioinformatics Institute has sections for the major divisions within the institute, but no indication that a single lab such this warrants inclusion in that article. We certainly don't have articles for individual research labs or groups within a research institute, and I don't see how a redirect for this title would be useful.--Pontificalibus (talk) 19:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as nominator suggests though I doubt editorially that much material would actually be warranted at VBI. I do not see notability adequately established but neither do I see any need for the article's history to be removed. Thincat (talk) 21:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge relevant content into the VBI article. Individual laboratories are very unlikely to be notable for the purposes of an individual article, unless they have produced Lasker and Nobel prize winners. JFW | T@lk 08:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.