Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEO Connect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NEO Connect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product of a non-notable company. References are PR. No in-depth coverage in independent sources. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with the proposed deletion. Article can be improved with further citations from independent sources, or alternatively should be merged with NEO Exchange which has more notability. --CorSter (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I nominated the article was because I couldn't find further citations from independent sources. If you know of any please do add them. I would oppose a merger with NEO Exchange because this product has nothing to do with NEO Exchange, other than being created by the same company.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:GNG. Article literally has a directory in it, so fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't be supported by multiple independent, reliable sources. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 16:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.