Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyLOL (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MyLOL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Social networking site for teenagers. In the AfD discussion in 2008 the site was found to be notable because it was covered in multiple reliable sources; all those sources were newspaper articles about security concerns, since the site had been used by adults who sought contact with teenagers. Today, there is only one English-language RS to be found; I have made a good-faith search for other sources but found nothing else. That means that the only good source for the article is an article from 2008 about the website's security practices, which to me seems as if the site is notable for one event only, rather than generally notable. Note also that a user with a user name indicating that they are involved with the site (mylol.net is owned by the company Jiggie, Inc. as seen here) has been making promotional edits to the article, adding unsourced and unencyclopedic information. When that is removed, pretty much all that remains is the two-year-old news report on possible security problems, and I don't think that's enough for WP:WEB. bonadea contributions talk 11:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep and Expand - This website is barely notible based on looking at the article, though a Google search for the site name does return quite a few results, the information on this page needs to be condenced and expanded -Joker264 (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find any additional sources and the available WP:RS coverage doesn't satisfy WP:WEB. — Rankiri (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing on G News CTJF83 chat 05:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Small time. Going nowhere but bust. Szzuk (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.