Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutilación general
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 21:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mutilación general (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability, Reliable 3rd party sources. It is a Forum that seems to be making pretty broad and unsubstantiated claims about its notability. Pharmboy 20:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not mentioned in any of the 3rd party sources it cites. Leuko 21:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 21:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fora-related deletions. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 21:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The title doesn't match the article contents... is this General[M]ayhem or is it Mutilación general? 132.205.44.5 21:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes. That is yet another problem. I didn't list all the problems this article has, just the most obvious to get a delete over with, and it isn't a candidate for speedy. I did just notice that the article General Mayhem is protected to prevent creation, and General mayhem (small m) has been deleted before. Pharmboy 22:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/General_Mayhem where it was kept, then deleted for the same reason: reliable sources could never be found in spite of promises to get them. Unremarkable. Was ALSO up and DELETED in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Genmay for same.
Likely candiate for speedy delete now that I have seen this, and it appears it WAS speedy deleted prior, under a different name. Pharmboy 22:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per Pharmboy.Brusegadi 05:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.