Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ms Lynch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 23:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ms Lynch

No significant coverage in reliable sources located despite attempts. No claim of notability (such as hits or opening for extremely notable acts). Bongomatic (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I will leave it to others to decide if this makes them notable, the duo were part of undeniably notable girl group B*Witched. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to B*Witched. There's no need for this to be at afd, there's verifiable information here that has relevance to another article. Hiding T 10:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should delete the article? They were notable back when they were famous. No sign of notability. 121.96.116.183 (talk) 15:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: This debate has been included in the list of music related discussions. ApprenticeFan (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The group Same Difference have their own Wikipedia page. They are notable due to their involvement with X Factor, however, they ahve not released any material as of yet either. I think being one half of a Girl Band that holds the record for four consecutive Number One records inclusive of their debut, is just as worthy a claim to fame as being a competing act on The X Factor. -- Daibh\^talk 19:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Have they released any singles or are planning to? With regard to the vote to delete, I would strongly disgree as there is no reason just to delete it. The content is certainly notable even if only with it being merged into the [B*Witched]] article and redirected. Maybe then if/when they become notable in their own right the article can then be started again.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.