Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Key

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Key

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be about a non-notable character in a video game. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me and a lot of other people completely disagree with the nominated deletion. Besides, how is Mr. Key non-notable? The fact that he is getting highly popular fan-made spinoff levels should definitely prove otherwise Woutery (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)— Woutery (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I agree. Just because YOU don't recognise who Mr. Key is doesn't make him "non-notable". (talk)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jovuto (talk • contribs) 21:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)— Jovuto (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

True but a lack of any reliable sources means that notability has not been established.--76.65.42.142 (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Woodroar (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: What makes Mr. Key non-notable is that it hasn’t received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. That's pretty much Wikipedia's standard of notability. —teb728 t c 07:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There isn't a single reference in the article; a quick search reveals there is no coverage in reliable, independent sources. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no claim to any real notability, no reference. The only people who oppose deletion in this debate appear to be single purpose accounts. JIP | Talk 07:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails both WP:N and WP:V.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.