Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mozilla Firefox versus Internet Explorer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete SkierRMH (talk) 09:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mozilla Firefox versus Internet Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Deletion nom was PRODed, but that was removed without comment or fixes, so I am bringing it here. Article is entirely original research and redundant with Comparison of web browsers. No referencing, and since we already have a page that covers this, I see no reason for this second article. Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Total OR and lots of inaccurate NPOV violations. Collectonian (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. WP:V might be satisfied, but it looks like a breach of WP:SOAP and WP:NOT Wisdom89 (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. redundant to the Comparison of web browsers article which is superior in quality--Lenticel (talk) 03:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research/possible soapboxing. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per the above (unnecessary duplicate content). - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteAs everyone above. Alberon (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 11:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too POV. Thundermaster367Thundermaster's Talk 13:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with my colleagues, above - too POV for me. I'd think it's a fork from Comparison of web browsers, but it might just be a soapbox. Either way, no. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.