Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorvators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motorvators

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

EXTREMELY minor Transformers subgroup. It's unlikely reliable sources exist to verify notability. Divebomb (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- very minor, not notable. --Khajidha (talk) 13:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Allen for IPv6 18:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect to Transformers (toy line). What little coverage these characters got is not enough by far for their own article. JIP | Talk 07:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You're kidding right? They never got any coverage. They just.....exist. --Divebomb (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for the sake of building a consensus. But the lack of substantial coverage in third-party sources would be enough to warrant deletion according to the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- there is no sourced content, so a merge is not appropriate. Feel free to establish a redirect after deletion if you want. Reyk _YO! 01:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - more thinly veiled rubbish trying to pass itself as notable without reliable sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 18:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see why these guys should be mentioned anywhere really. NotARealWord (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.