Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoneyStrands
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Strands. MBisanz talk 01:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- MoneyStrands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declining db-spam; taking to AfD. The yahoo.com ref is okay, the others are iffy, and this is a new service, possibly not in full operation. Also, tone is too promotional. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 23:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 23:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 23:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article could use some work, but there are reliable sources talking about the service. Timmeh! 23:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Smells too much like advert. Was clearly written without NPOV and external links (especially security related) don't do anything to establish notability. JCutter (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Security related external links have been removed, and some promotional statements (about the services/features) have been rephrased. The article also lists out websites offering similar services, which could be useful to Wikipedia users. Ramya.arjun (talk) 02:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- per AFD guidelines, I should point out the comment above is from the article's primary poster. JCutter (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into article about the product's company: Strands. PKT(alk) 15:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 03:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.