Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modiano (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator, page expanded. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 22:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modiano (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TWODABS. Modiano redirects to Patrick's page. So we can use the template {{redirect}} to simply say:

Of course if other "Modiano" appears, this nomination can be closed anytime. (Note: I know the "category this nomination belongs in" is to disambiguation pages, but Twinkle doesn't give the option to nominate it there). © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 07:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC) © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 07:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm the creator of the page, and I've no objection to deletion. (If you're wondering, I created it to avoid the clutter that disambiguation hatnotes can create. However, I do see that the novelist is the predominant meaning.) In fact, it's not worth spending time on, so I think it should be speedy-deleted under G7 or just make a quick executive deletion.--A bit iffy (talk) 08:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Changed mind to Keep as per Pam below.--A bit iffy (talk) 17:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: dab page has been expanded; assume the French Nobel-prizewinning writer is still the primary topic, so current situation is OK (have changed the "redirect" hatnote there to point to the dab page, not just the market). (@Northamerica1000: would you like to change your mind about G7?) PamD 16:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:PamD: I haven't !voted here; only provided deletion sorting. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, misread the lines above. (@A bit iffy: would you like to change your mind about G7?) PamD 17:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.