Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mod=14willlh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - blatant use of Wikipedia as a free host on a ridiculous title. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Mod=14willlh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be a description of an original research project. I can't tell if the author is using Wikipedia as a webhost, in which case it could be deleted per WP:NOTWEBHOST, or if the author intends this as a method of publishing their research, in which case WP:NOR applies. ChemNerd (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. This isn't even an attempt to write an encyclopedic article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Qwertyus. There should be a WP:SPEEDY category for pages that are clearly not intended to be an encyclopedia article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTAWEBHOST. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I left a note yesterday for the author to see if he might explain his intent, but received no reply. It isn't clear what this is. It looks like a hodgepodge with no clear associating topic. The title is opaque and appears to be nonsense. Of no encyclopedic value as is and no way to figure out what to do with it. Purge. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.