Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Cube
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mobile Cube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable and, as far as I can tell, defunct product. The article cites no references to reliable sources. Upon doing some searches, I found no additional information on either this product, or its creator. The only results, aside from mirrors of this Wikipedia article, are simply the patent information for the device. Note that there have been several other products over the years referred to as a "Mobile Cube", but they have no relation to this water-purification device. Rorshacma (talk) 18:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find any sources. A search for Mobile Cube+Robert Niederer brings up a few patents but that's all. Nothing more. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 22:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG, no RS. Spyder212 (talk) 04:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.