Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixcloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mixcloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Mixcloud. Went beta in March 2009.

This is one Part of a larger attempt to use wikipedia for Spam and promotion, see also -Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#MIXCLOUD_LTD_Spam

Nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 17:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Cited entirely w/ links to the subject's official site. GNews turns up some hits, but only one is on an RS source and it's a trivial mention. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advertisement. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Begrudging keep~~. Shamelessly promotional, but this is getting a lot of GNews hits. Needs rewriting though, or if no-one has the time to do that, it need reducing to a stub. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google news gets two hits from their search. One selling a credit service the other mentions them as paying for a DJ at someones party.--Hu12 (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't know about the filters used on the AfD pages. Okay, not arguing. Delete. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional, even if I like what comes out of it. Miami33139 (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.