Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misbug
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Misbug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. The content of the article, in my opinion, would be better suited to Wikitionary than Wikipedia. AtlasDuane (talk) 12:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Not even dictionary, since as the article even admits, it was never in general use. I have been a software engineer for 40 years and never heard it until now. W Nowicki (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: completely irrelevant article Porphyro (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: let's not be a mirror for the Jargon File. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 12:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.