Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minions of Mirth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-administrative closure). No consensus to delete as the subject is notable and reliable sources were found. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minions of Mirth

Original prod for advertising was removed with notability fixes. Per WP:EL#ADV, Article is still an advert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elleachaudaucul (talk • contribs) 2008/07/08 21:26:39

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Don't know what state the article was in at the time of nomination, but article includes several non-trivial sources, and is a well-known game, so I don't see a problem. If the article reads too much like an ad, then it can be revised accordingly. 23skidoo (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You've argued that the article is an advert, can you argue that the article will continue to be an advert? It's genuinely worrying that we seem to be losing sight of the matter that this encyclopedia is under construction, with a deadline tentatively set at the time the sun explodes. --Kiz o r 16:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Keep Notable game, a (very) slight advertising tone is no reason for deletion. In the time spent prodding and AFDing this article it could just have easily been repaired and the tag removed. Other sources: [1] [2]. Someone another 16:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added referencees to demonstrate notability before the article was nominated for AfD. --Eastmain (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the same reasons Someoneanother mentioned. Remember, AfD is not a request for cleanup. MuZemike (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.