Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minax (Ultima)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ultima II. Sandstein 23:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minax (Ultima)

Plot summary, and looking around there doesn't seem to be any information for WP:N. Last edit to the article was July 30. Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ultima II, where the bulk of her plot contribution is. Nifboy (talk) 06:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. There's not much more here than the plot of Ultima II, so there's no point in having a separate article. Xihr 07:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge. I'm not really super familiar with the topic, but as noted it doesn't appear to meet WP:N. If it can be merged into the plot section, all the better, if not... well I searched and I just couldn't turn up anything. Icemotoboy (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect: doesn't meet WP:N, because there are no reliable third-party sources on this topic. But might be important enough to the series to warrant a redirect. Randomran (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mgm|^(talk) 12:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Ultima II (just create a plot heading and dump what's here underneath) and redirect. Stripping out the pre-amble and trivia would result in a basic plot outline for Ultima II, I'll tweak it if that's the result of the AFD. Someone another 01:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge rather than delete. -- Banjeboi 14:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into a quick summary. One of the main villains of the series. Not notable enough for an article though, because it lacks reliable third-party sources, thus failing our WP:N guideline. Randomran (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.