Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midsteel Pipeline Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted , unambiguous copyright violation (WP:CSD#G12). MLauba (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Midsteel Pipeline Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like an advertisement, but seems too long/elaborate for speedy delete Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 10:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It reads like one long advert, with links to the website interspersed throughout the text. Aiken ♫ 13:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Based on copyright violation as shown here [1]. Shame, a lot of work went into the article. However, the company, in and of itself, does not have coverage by third party – verifiable and reliable sources. In addition, the cut and paste from the company’s website is a blatant and flagrant violation of policy with regards to copyright law. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 13:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops, I didn't even check that... good catch. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 14:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article should now be speedy-deleted, if this is the case. Aiken ♫ 14:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.