Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid-volume transaction output

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-volume transaction output

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Entire content seems to be directed toward evaluation considerations for MVTO equipment purchases. My updates yesterday were to remove Orphan status. After further thought, there is not enough content for a stand-alone article. Prior to deletion, perhaps this Mid-volume transaction output article could become a section in another article?

For example, in articles Offset printing or Printer (publishing) this content might be added as a new section title of Equipment purchase considerations or similar name.

JoeHebda (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is too poor quality to salvage anything. It doesn't even say what the subject of the article is; "a space in the production printing environment" could be just about anything. And without sources it's going to be hard to fix. Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with JoeHebda above. Not to mention that it's completely unsourced. I do not believe this could become a section in another article to be honest; and if it were to be considered for that; it would need a massive overhaul and some sort of sourcing. The Undead Never Die (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:RS, WP:NOTDIC. Appears too specific a term to stand as its own section in existing printing articles. --Djembayz (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.