Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meteor Lake (microprocessor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meteor Lake (microprocessor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTCRYSTAL WP:TOOSOON - internal company development/testing emails are not reliable sources, product plans can change. Wikipedia is not the place to share speculation or insider info. Vossanova ^o< 13:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the page, and I agree that it should be deleted. However, I think a version should be archived so that I, or other users, does not have to start all over with the page again. Alex1611 ^o< 10:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or move to Draft because of WP:TOOSOON, absence of reliable sources. Anton.bersh (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.