Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercer Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mercer Union

Please delete, this is an article about an art center no more notable than any other. The only references are to articles that are really about an artist who displayed there, not the gallery. (This nomination made on behalf of Special:Contributions/141.161.68.46, who is unable to create this page.) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 03:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notability established through quick Google search this article could be easily expanded no reason for delete. I belive the only reason it was put up in the fisrt place was because of Wikipedia:I just don't like it. Kyle1278 (talk) 03:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Mercer Union has been around for 30 years. The article needs more sources, agreed, but those can be easily found. Over the next few days I'll expand the article. freshacconci talktalk 03:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While some additional sources would be useful, the Eli Langer case — already noted in the article — is sufficient notability in and of itself. Keep. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above...Modernist (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has achieved more notability than a run of the mill art center. Ty 18:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.