Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical statistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Scientizzle 00:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Medical statistics

Poorly focused article, with no real content —G716 <^T·_C> 11:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- —G716 <^T·_C> 14:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- —G716 <^T·_C> 14:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article could become useful. Note that it is already linked from several other articles, meaning that the editors there suggested creating this article. Don't think the arguments for deletion are the right ones; this topic has verifiable, reputable sources. It doesn't look like OR either. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a list of about two dozen concepts that should be presented here. It clearly needs work, but there's plenty of scope here for a Feature-length article, and there is no shortage of potential sources. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
obvious keep notable, encyclopedic subject. Sticky Parkin 18:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely is notable and important. Sentriclecub (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.