Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medaforce
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 02:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Medaforce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and no assertion of notability. Therefore, no article. Divebomb (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Medabots. Regarding references, I'm sure it cannot be a problem to find one or two. But the concept discussed in the article is part of an anime series and is not going to be notable on its own. -- BenTels (talk) 14:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cut down and Merge per BenTelsSadads (talk) 20:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Medabots. Medaforce could be summed up in under three sentences. This article was created by fans for fans and is not encyclopedic. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 10:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete DragonZero (talk · contribs) 04:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete having a mysterious force that powers up the characters is one of the oldest and widest-spread fictional tropes of them all, and nothing suggests this series' handling of the concept is in any way special or warrants detailed coverage. I'm not even sure this warrants a redirect. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.