Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meat Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meat Magazine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think it is notable. It doesn't have good sources, and I am unable to find good sources for it Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 12:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 12:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 12:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: please note this is different from the LGBT magazine Meat Magazine (aka Meatzine) which has a bit more coverage that I came across looking for sources on this one. Also, the article was started by a user who never edited any other articles, and since 2011 has been marked as looking like an advert. So I feel it was probably a never-notable project which someone made an article to promote and which never gained enough coverage for notability in the years since. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk • contribs) 13:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is just not there to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor sourcing and little indication of notability. The claim "It won the Guardian Student Media Awards for best new small budget publication and runner up for best publication design in 2004", itself unreferenced, doesn't seem like sufficient for GNG anyway. -_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.