Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazooma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mazooma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't appear to be a notable product or service and feels like an advertisement. Roman à clef (talk) 19:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm leaning towards delete because, not only are the current references press releases, Google News archives found additional promotional results or press releases here, here and here (it's not worth continuing with the results). I should note that there is another company with the name "Mazooma", a digital gaming company. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minimal coverage by secondary sources, outside of press releases, which are not considered reliable. The subject does not meet the general notability criteria.--xanchester (t) 19:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I paged through all the news results; not a single one was not a press release, which doesn't qualify as a reliable source under WP:GNG. Nothing to show otherwise elsewhere. Delete for lack of reliable source coverage. --Batard0 (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable at this time. — ΛΧΣ21™ 19:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.