Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxlab Entertainments
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 14:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Maxlab Entertainments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP. spam like article. hardly any third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 14:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 00:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Richard (talk) 23:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per above and WP:CRYSTAL. The article itself notes this is a new company - "was founded in 2009 ...." and predicts things: "The company will make its presence felt ... aims at building ... [and] will strive ...." None of these facts are allegations about its current notability. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Check
[edit]Now please check if there is any problems in the article. Saj2009 (talk) 19:24, 14 Sep 2009
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.