Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximum Computers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maximum Computers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally thought this was a hoax because it had a history that didn't exist, a stock ticker that didn't exist, and claimed that 7 years after 9/11 was 1996... but now the editor has explained that it was actually a fictional company in a series of Youtube skits. We don't have any articles on that youtube skit itself (that I can find).

In the best of worlds we'd merge this into the youtube skit page, but I don't even know if that would qualify as notable. I'm confident that an in-universe aspect of a possibly notable youtube skit is not. Shadowjams (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as a fictional company with no demonstrable notability. No sources are provided. Searching for sources, the term "Maximum computers" turns up all sorts of stuff, but qualifying it with Bedle and Tuse turns up nothing but the wikipedia page. -- Whpq (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Racepacket (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unreferenced, non-notable. --EEMIV (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.