Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matouš Ruml

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matouš Ruml

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I feel that this subject does not satisfy the criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER, the one reference supplied does not establish notability Jezhotwells (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Matouš Ruml is a notable young theatre and TV actor and his performances were noted by multiple reliable and independent sources. I found an interview at the official website of the Czech Television, a review of his performance in a theatre adaptation of the book/film Closely Watched Trains (published by the Czech Radio), another review of his performance in the play Romeo and Juliet (the magazine Sedmička is a supplement of the widely read Czech newspaper Mladá fronta DNES), two articles published by deník.cz (a regional newspaper published in Bohemia and Moravia). Aside from his theatre work, he has been involved in various TV productions. Letiště (TV Prima), Comeback (TV Nova) and Život na zámku (Czech Television) are well known TV series in the Czech Republic (source: TV Nova, official website). In my opinion it is enough to meet our notability requirements. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment': But all we have so far in the article is one reference to a promotional interview on the web site of a Czech TV show which contains passing mentions that he has studied acting and done some theatre work. The list of theatre credits given gives nio indications of whether the roles undertaken were significant in many cases and includes theatre school roles which are not professional and thus count for little. If all of this other sources exist then they should be added to the article with corresponding text translated for clarity. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.