Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematics and Computing Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics and Computing Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic doesn't seem notable to me. The sources are all universities that offer courses with this name (or similar names) except for the page on Careers360.com, which appears to be either a copy of the article, or vice-versa. If the article is a copy of that page, there are obviously WP:COPYVIO issues too. Yaris678 (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree that it appears to be blatant WP:COPYVIO, and rather bad at that. - SanAnMan (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I'm not finding anything to actually suggest a better article. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this is no article. It could be rewritten from scratch as sub-sub-section on Delhi Technological University. –Be..anyone 💩 08:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Copyvio, notability, and RS problems. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article seems to be about a specific programme offered by a particular university, and not about the "discipline" in general. There are already well written articles about Computer Science and Mathematics. The programme the article refers to is not notable enough to have it's own Wikipedia article. At best, a single line mention in the article of the university may suffice. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a linguistic conflation rather than an encyclopedic concept, which is why the proffered references are university course pages, rather than proper WP:RS, with analysis and review of topic, and why the article itself says the topic has been labeled differently by other universities. Also probable WP:COPYVIO as noted. Nothing here to salvage, and even if references could be found, WP:TNT applies, and there are extant articles e.g. Theoretical computer science. FeatherPluma (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.