Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematical statistics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep. This isn't the place for a redirect/merge discussion. Refer to talk page of said article, where I have created a merge discussion. (non-admin closure) Nordic Nightfury 15:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematical statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Turn into a redirect to Statistics. Further discussion, see talk page. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a question of how we should organise our content rather than whether our coverage of a topic should be deleted, so I think it should be decided on the relevant talk page(s) rather than by a deletion discussion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, procedural keep, that is. This is the wrong forum for merge or redirect discussions; those discussions are best done on the talk page, maybe with an RfC. This venue is for deletion discussions. --Mark viking (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Clearly is an elaboration of a subtopic of Statics that bears expansion. User:HopsonRoad 22:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.