Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateusz Gamrot (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mateusz Gamrot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NMMA for not having min 3 fights under top tier promotion such as UFC or Invicta. Subject also fails GNG not having WP:SIGCOV in dept and detail coverage from WP:IS, WP:RS (IRS). Fight info are merely routine coverage. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. All the specialized sport biographies are a major nuisance, being way overly inclusive anyway. The subject fails NBIO/GNG and that's all we should care about. That said, I should note that while our article is undereferenced, Polish article about him cites dozens of news pieces - but they are all from niche portals about this minorty sport like inthecage.pl and such. So SIGCOV might exists, the problem is that it is in niche outlets of dubious reliability. Some of those sources are also WP:INTERVIEWS (best: [1]). Sample other sources, often mixing interview, press releases and videos too: [2], [3], [4]... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, for reasons mentioned above HeinzMaster (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.