Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marathwada Neta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marathwada Neta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regional newspaper not even a state level one failing WP:ORG and WP:GNG. It claims to be first Marathi-language online newspaper, but for which I can't find any verification. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Article surely needs more clean up and improvement but it is surely not case of deletion. One can see 100s of websites mentioning this newspaper on web search. Though currently its online version is suspended still its print version is highly popular not only in Marathwada region but also in entire Maharashtra. I think we should improve the article instead of deleting it. --Human3015 knock knock • 02:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improve like how? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article fails WP:ORG as well as it does not meets WP:GNG. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 08:51, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - only source in the article is dead now, seems the paper was short-lived. Kraxler (talk) 01:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.