Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing test requirement design specification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturing test requirement design specification

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been unsourced since Jan 2007. Notability of topic is in question. Coin945 (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy keep~~, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is very clearly a dictionary definition. All articles need sources as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is no evidence that this type of document is really an indepdently notable topic from other design related documents.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- not seeing any sources to support this.--Rusf10 (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article provides no real useful content, there's no sources, and this does not seem like a real thing to me. There are are a whopping 25 Google results for this phrase. All of them seem to be Wikipedia mirrors, content mills, or whatever the hell this is. jp×g 07:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect, to Quality assurance. I suspect that this term is specific to the author's then employer. SailingInABathTub (talk) 12:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.