Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manu V. Devadevan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manu V. Devadevan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails WP:WRITER-specific as well as WP:BASIC notability guidelines. As far as I can tell, the footnotes in the article are comments rather than sources of coverage (third party or otherwise), and my searches have yielded virtually zero coverage. JFHJr (㊟) 20:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThe author is quite notable and has written and translated famous books. Definately passes WP:BASIC Uncletomwood (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Care to cite some WP:RS that's relevant to specific policies of inclusion? Or are you merely in the WP:ILIKEIT camp? Qworty (talk) 06:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:RS whatsoever to satisfy WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 06:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.