Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Kumar Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Headmaster of a village primary school may be a meritorious occupation, but I'm not seeing any plausible claim to wiki-notability. Due to some odd page-move history, there is a copy of this at Manoj Kumar (educator). XOR'easter (talk) 18:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Comes pretty close to A7, I think; I might hesitate because there's a source listed but it doesn't look to be independent coverage. The world is full of extremely meritorious individuals who are key to their local community but have no global notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The source is from a national non-profit pro-government-school organization, not from the local primary school he heads, so I think it's independent enough. But it's only one source, not enough by itself for GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.