Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ManhattanGMAT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ManhattanGMAT

Extensive news searches have found no significant coverage of this organization. Articles on the topic have been speedied numerous times before but in order to prevent that going forward (at least for a while), an AfD would be useful. Bongo matic 23:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Promotional piece; fails WP:CORP. §FreeRangeFrog 01:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - spam. Lacks 3rd party independent coverage where this company is the subject (and not merely mentioned in some larger context). Small Business award is interesting but does't establish notability in the absense of sufficient coverage.--Rtphokie (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There has been extensive and noteworthy media coverage of ManhattanGMAT in relation to the company's founder, Zeke Vanderhoek. Also, the About.com article is third party and was not a piece initiated by the company. This article is as unbiased and noteworthy as the articles on Knewton, Princeton Review, and Kaplan.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrp3d (talk • contribs) 15:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC) — Jrp3d (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete - minimal outside citations, and reference to growth numbers is unverified and appears self-promotional. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.