Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Bartimaeus
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Bartimaeus Sequence. History will be left intact given the interest in merge and/or transwiki. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Magic in Bartimaeus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not establish notability independent of the Bartimaeus Sequence through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but merge - though I agree with the nominators concerns about real world information and third party sources. However, at least some of this information should be documented as part of Bartimaeus Sequence because it is fundamental contextual information for understanding the world in which the books are set, Sadads (talk) 03:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. It could also be merged into Bartimaeus Sequence, but I think anything merged would probably just get cut out as unsourced original research. Background information, glossaries, and other in-universe writing belongs on Wikia, where they don't care about notability or verifiability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Bartimaeus Sequence, I couldn't find any information on this as a stand-alone topic. --Cerebellum (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG. I left a message at the Bartimaeus Wikia to see if anyone wants to copy it over there. [1]-- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm Petera275, in charge of the Bartimaeus Wikia. I'd be more than happy to copy this over, and I thank you very much for notifying me of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.251.131 (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.