Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MadNet

Article has been tagged for notability issues and references since August 2008. I have searched the internet and cannot find any 3rd party references that can show this company as notable or validate any of it's claims ErnestVoice ^{(User) (Talk)} 12:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough external sources to qualify for WP:COMPANY. Plenty of ghits, but none assert notability as the nom says. DARTH PANDA ^duel 14:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would say A7/ G11 speedy except that it does have an assertion of notability being the first company in Serbia to offer fixed wireless internet services. Fails WP:V and WP:RS miserably, google turns up nothing usable. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 15:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One explanation for the lack of references might be that most Romanian newspapers and magazines don't make the full text of their articles available online. I think that references in reliable sources almost certainly exist, but editors without access to printed copies of Romanian publications will have difficulty finding them. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:44, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I can't tell if the Romanian company and the Serbian company are related or not. Their websites look different, and if they were under the same ownership, I would expect them to use identical logos and similar-looking websites. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:44, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'd be willing to bet that some sources can be found, but can notability be established? (Ah, forgot to sign... Sorry!) DARTH PANDA ^duel 01:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.