Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac OS X 10.6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Mac OS X. Since it's been edited so heavily by anons and the AFD tag was removed twice by the same anon, it may need semi-protection for a while. I'll keep it on my watchlist to see if text is readded. - KrakatoaKatie 21:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mac OS X 10.6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unannounced future product. WP:CRYSTAL. Prod removed without discussion. Dethme0w 02:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Bushcarrot Talk Please Sign! Let's go Lightning! 02:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:CRYSTAL is not a criterion for speedy deletion. i (soon to be Soleil) 02:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. I think Mac OS X 10.5 just came out. It's much too early for this article to be around. Let's wait for some official statements about 10.6 first. --Kyoko 02:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirecting to Mac OS X sounds good too. I remember reading somewhere (maybe MacWorld magazine?) that Apple had an anticipated 12 to 18 month interval between OS releases, and maybe that info could be put in the main Mac OS X article, but I don't want to put that it without a firm citation. --Kyoko 03:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystalballery, or just redirect os OS X i (soon to be Soleil) 02:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:V, and (for good measure) WP:NOR --jonny-mt(t)(c) 05:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - this is extremely premature. The article is totally speculative, and likely to remain so for a long time - 10.5 was quite literally released in the last 24-48 hours, so any solid information on the next version is at least six months away. Zetawoof(ζ) 11:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mac OS X until it comes out & gets notable enough to warrant its own article. SkierRMH 00:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect to Mac OS X 132.205.99.122 20:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect unless there is any proof - Apple never said there is going to be a 10.6. It is interesting, maybe since so many people are interested in it and many rumors have formed, there could be an article about the rumors? But it is probably just best if it redirects, at least until there is any real info on it. I really would like to have the article, but it's just not encyclopedia worthy right now. (And whoever made it, it should have been titled Mac OS X v10.6, not Mac OS X 10.6.) Althepal 18:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.