Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARRVEL
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- MARRVEL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable website. The paper that is cited in the article has one total academic citation, and the non-academic work on this is either PR or a recycling of press releases. In short, this fails WP:GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 02:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete because it fails WP:GNG.Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please, I don't watch pages) 04:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 06:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Marvel Comics. I agree that MARRVEL has not established notability. It is very highly likely that someone who types this term into the search box is simply misspelling MARVEL. - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think an all caps misspelling is an ideal candidate for a redirect. To be honest, if I saw it as one, I'd nominate it for deletion at RfD. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:WEBCRIT, no indication of notability. Cjhard (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - TheMagnificentist 11:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.