Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAC for Geographic Routing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MAC for Geographic Routing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from unencyclopedic style, appears to fail WP:GNG, not having attracted notice outside of a research paper about underwater acoustic networks. Batard0 (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete one research paper doth not an article make. Mangoe (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:31, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Where are the references that would meet WP:GNG? Hoppingalong (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of sources to show how its notable. SalHamton (talk) 02:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was unable to find any sources to establish the notability of the topic of the article. Ha dg er 23:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.