Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M2SYS Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Singularity 04:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- M2SYS Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Spam. Non-notable company, article created primarily by its own president who has also been linkspamming as well as removing links to his competitors elsewhere on Wikipedia (see contribs for M2arman (talk · contribs) and 72.151.108.254 (talk · contribs)). Mikeatsc (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable company. I added some references, including one article from the Kansas City Star. --Eastmain (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems to meet WP:CORP with three valid references. I took the liberty of some copyediting. As for the nomination rationale, please provide evidence that User:M2arman and User:72.151.108.254 are the same before such accusation. I agree that an affiliated of M2SYS should not be making their own company article, but it is in my opinion not spam, and seems to encyclopedic in norm. Meets notability requirements. Arsenikk (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to meet general notability guidelines given the reliable sourcses added by Eastmain and Arsenikk. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Meets general notability guideline per the references provided. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.