Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M&Ms - Shell Shocked

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Delete arguments are weak and outnumbered, but the merge opinion is not a viable result of a debate I can enforce: there are limits to what I can do as the closer. I would suggest that if someone wants to restructure our coverage of this area, they should boldly do so. Mango juice^talk 17:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M&Ms - Shell Shocked

Delete unsourced 1 liner article about a video game with no indication of its notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:I agree with the nominator. Schuym1 (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Game hasn't been reviewed in any reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 10:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of PlayStation 1 games, I'm coming up with absolutely zilch from google. The modern gaming sites don't offer a vast amount of coverage when it comes to the PS1 era, if the sources are anywhere they're in magazines. However, since this is a bog-standard licensed game, it's got less appeal to reviewers than say a Capcom game. If someone comes up with magazine sources down the line it can always be sprung out again. Someone another 11:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – There's nothing there. MuZemike (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Merge to M&Ms Video Games along with The Lost Formulas, following recent addition of information on this article. MuZemike (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, now a valid stub. Game shows up on Google, GameFAQs, and IGN. Consider doing something like what I just did when faced with an article that doesn't meet standards. Do you want to help the article or just be lazy and delete it? --AeronPrometheus (talk) 04:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, article should also be moved to M&Ms: Shell Shocked just to be finicky. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 04:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this and M&M's: The Lost Formulas to a new article M&Ms Video Games. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 10:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, I belive the above statement is best. Merge several smaller articles into a single medium sized article. mauler90 (talk) 07:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: the article has changed enough since several of the early !votes that it would be worthwhile relisting so the discussion can take place on the article as it now stands.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note Article has been moved to M&M's: Shell Shocked per an unopposed request at WP:Requested moves. JPG-GR (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, potentially all the way to M&M's, although M&M's video games isn't a bad idea either. Nifboy (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GR|JPG-GR]] (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, to M&M's (with section redirect), or M&M's video games. Not enough to say about this game for a whole article alone.Yobmod (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to M&M's video games. Even though now there are links to other websites, still doesn't assert much notability, as Gamestop, IGN etc. cover basicly all games. TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 16:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.