Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lugnutz
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Transformers: Cybertron characters#Lugnutz. Feel free to merge any usable content from the page history. T. Canens (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lugnutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-major fictional character. No sources to indicate notability. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List_of_Transformers:_Cybertron_characters#Lugnutz Mathewignash (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge - weak notability and doesn't even have bad sources to pretend it has notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delte. No real word in real life note. Tedescoboy22 (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable. --Khajidha (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Mathewignash. This doesn't deserve its own page. --Divebomb (talk) 12:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to the list of characters. --Malkinann (talk) 02:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge to List of Transformers: Cybertron characters. We should always look for an appropriate place to merge non-notable character articles, per WP:PRESERVE instead of outright deleting unless the character is incidental (either having no affect on the main plot or appears in only one or two episodes. So far, none of those advocating deletion have not argued that this is an incidental character. —Farix (t | c) 11:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.