Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low taper fade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. per WP:SNOW, it's clear where this is going. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Low taper fade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable meme, AI-generated, barely sourced. If this was one of those brain rots then fine, I'll let it slide :)

Though I do hear it on the Internet quite often 😁 Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:BADIDEA The article only has one source, which is Yahoo news. This appears to be a meme about a haircut: "A low taper fade is a variation of the low taper haircut where the hair fades to skin level towards the neck and ears". — Maile (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maile. Nearly unsourced. Davemc0 (talk) 06:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless more reliable sources can be found. Fails notability. Marincyclist (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Duplicated by a slightly better AfC submission anyways. Draft:Low taper fade (meme) ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Ah, that meme. Yea, there's like one source. Looks like it fails WP:GNG. mer764KC / Cospaw⛲️ (He/Him | 💬Talk! • 📦Contributions) 12:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wanting a celebrity to get a certain haircut isn't notable. The one source used isn't enough and this appears to have faded away, with no media mentions since then. Oaktree b (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The infamous "massive" meme. Delete because there are no reliable sources and fails WP:GNG. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 16:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Ninja_(gamer)#Low_Taper_Fade, though delete is preferable as the "low taper fade" section of the Ninja article has questionable WP:WEIGHT. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and lack significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 18:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Temple fade (hairstyle) already covers this meme, which is ultimately not supported by WP:GNG jolielover♥talk 18:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this meme is still MASSIVE but not still massive for WP, the closest thing I found to a reliable source is this WP:DAILYDOT articles (1, 2) Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.