Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogicBuy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LogicBuy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Press releases are used in the article and I could only find routine trivial coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 06:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:38, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Only brief mentions for marketing and sponsorship purposes, other than a single news item about it being acquired in 2011. —Madrenergic^talk 07:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 02:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - references nowhere near suitable - only a small amount of Sig Cov, which is all press stuff, the rest are barely mentions. WP:NWEB and presumably WP:NCORP not satisfied. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.