Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock-ups
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lock up. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lock-ups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be non-notable toy, was a redirect before being edited changed from that by an ip. Found a couple on Ebay but no entries on the web at all The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't require the administrators' deletion tool in order to revert back to the version that was a redirect. Uncle G (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- simply turning it back into a redirect seems not the right when that change was over three years ago. If it happened in the Last 72 hours i would probably revert it but when its been here three years? No better to do an AFD. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or turn back into a redirect. No notability asserted, no sources. JIP | Talk 13:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to disambiguation page. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 06:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to dab page lock up. Several items there are more likely targets for this common phrase, which as such should not be deleted. Wanted to preserve the text but the purported link to manufacturer "Kidco" actually points to a movie of that name. I generally favor keeping brand names but there is no place for either of them without sources. JJB 02:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.