Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LlamaBot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LlamaBot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This bot is "just another channel bot", written for an apparently popular channel on an IRC network which I have never heard of, violating the GNU General Public License by not having the script source code (or the script at all) available for download by the public. The article is badly written, it fails WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:V and possibly WP:NOT. The article was also considered for speedy deletion. カラム 06:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 20:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the assertions of User:GCFreak2 including WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. I have an interest in the subject of the article (and was a significant contributor to it), but the points brought up by GCFreak2 do merit the article for deletion at its present state. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NPOV as well as failing WP:WEB, as it has no reliable independent sources on it, and has not won any major independent awards. - RD (Talk) 07:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails every test imaginable that could possibly apply. JBsupreme (talk) 08:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.