Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of unsolved problems
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was problem solved - deleted. - Mailer Diablo 12:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lists of unsolved problems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Listcruft. There is no information here except links. Possibly a WP:CSD#A3 candidate (a rephrasing of the title). --Chris (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, no - it's not a list at all. When I saw the link I was pretty much "wtf", because I hate listcruft with my dark bleeding heart. I clicked, and was quite surprised to see that it wasn't listcruft at all. Silly either way - we don't need this article, and we don't need the article suggested by the title. Hence, Delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nazgjunk (talk • contribs) 06:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Can't figure out the purpose of this article. "A list of unsolved problems is a list that contains the unsolved problems of a specific area of interest" is quite self-evident. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; I don't see what the list could possibly provide more than the categories. Tizio 11:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is an indexing page. There are enough unsolved problems to warrant a breakdown by fields, and therefore enough to have a general directory of them. The fact that there is also a category is neither here nor there; a category is generated in software, a list is a catalogue raisonée that can include missing as well as existing entries. Category:Unsolved problems is in pretty sad shape, and does not contain even a tenth of the entries to which this list directs readers. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It would make more sense to properly categorize those articles then. --Chris (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Information is better served in the form of a category. Arkyan • (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This just duplicates what a category should do. However the Category:Lists_of_unsolved_problems needs to be populated with this information first. I do think that this only applies to this article; the individual "List of unsolved problems in xxxx" still should exist on their own merits. --Dmeranda 18:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This should be a category. Fishhead64 18:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete after repopulating per Dmeranda.Ezratrumpet 01:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.